This vignette describes what spherical geometry implies, and how
package sf
uses the s2geometry library (http://s2geometry.io) for
geometrical measures, predicates and transformations.
After sf
has been loaded, it will report whether
s2
is being used; it can be switched off (resorting to flat
space geometry) by sf_use_s2(FALSE)
.
Most of the package’s functions start with s2_
in the
same way that most sf
function names start with
st_
. Most sf
functions automatically use
s2
functions when working with ellipsoidal coordinates; if
this is not the case, e.g. for st_voronoi()
, a warning
like
Warning message:
In st_voronoi.sfc(st_geometry(x), st_sfc(envelope), dTolerance, :
st_voronoi does not correctly triangulate longitude/latitude data
is emitted.
Spatial coordinates either refer to projected (or Cartesian) coordinates, meaning that they are associated to points on a flat space, or to unprojected or geographic coordinates, when they refer to angles (latitude, longitude) pointing to locations on a sphere (or ellipsoid). The flat space is also referred to as R2, the sphere as S2
Package sf
implements simple features, a
standard for point, line, and polygon geometries where geometries are
built from points (nodes) connected by straight lines (edges). The
simple feature standard does not say much about its suitability for
dealing with geographic coordinates, but the topological relational
system it builds upon (DE9-IM) refer to R2, the two-dimensional
flat space.
Yet, more and more data are routinely served or exchanged using
geographic coordinates. Using software that assumes an R2, flat space may work
for some problems, and although sf
up to version 0.9-x had
some functions in place for spherical/ellipsoidal computations (from
package lwgeom
, for computing area, length, distance, and
for segmentizing), it has also happily warned the user that it is doing
R2, flat
computations with such coordinates with messages like
although coordinates are longitude/latitude, st_intersects assumes that they are planar
hinting to the responsibility of the user to take care of potential
problems. Doing this however leaves ambiguities, e.g. whether
LINESTRING(-179 0,179 0)
POINT(0 0)
, orPOINT(180 0)
and whether it is
Starting with sf
version 1.0, if you provide a spatial
object in a geographical coordinate reference system, sf
uses the new package s2
(Dunnington, Pebesma, Rubak 2020)
for spherical geometry, which has functions for computing pretty much
all measures, predicates and transformations on the sphere.
This means:
The s2
package is really a wrapper around the C++ s2geometry library which was written by
Google, and which is used in many of its products (e.g. Google Maps,
Google Earth Engine, Bigquery GIS) and has been translated in several
other programming languages.
With projected coordinates sf
continues to work in R2 as before.
Compared to geometry on R2, and DE9-IM, the
s2
package brings a few fundamentally new concepts, which
are discussed first.
On the sphere (S2), any polygon defines two areas; when following the exterior ring, we need to define what is inside, and the definition is the left side of the enclosing edges. This also means that we can flip a polygon (by inverting the edge order) to obtain the other part of the globe, and that in addition to an empty polygon (the empty set) we can have the full polygon (the entire globe).
Simple feature geometries should obey a ring direction too: exterior
rings should be counter clockwise, interior (hole) rings should be
clockwise, but in some sense this is obsolete as the difference between
exterior ring and interior rings is defined by their position (exterior,
followed by zero or more interior). sf::read_sf()
has an
argument check_ring_dir
that checks, and corrects, ring
directions and many (legacy) datasets have wrong ring directions. With
wrong ring directions, many things still work.
For S2, ring
direction is essential. For that reason, st_as_s2
has an
argument oriented = FALSE
, which will check and correct
ring directions, assuming that all exterior rings occupy an area smaller
than half the globe:
nc = read_sf(system.file("gpkg/nc.gpkg", package="sf")) # wrong ring directions
s2_area(st_as_s2(nc, oriented = FALSE)[1:3]) # corrects ring direction, correct area:
## [1] 1137107793 610916077 1423145355
s2_area(st_as_s2(nc, oriented = TRUE)[1:3]) # wrong direction: Earth's surface minus area
## [1] 5.100649e+14 5.100655e+14 5.100646e+14
nc = read_sf(system.file("gpkg/nc.gpkg", package="sf"), check_ring_dir = TRUE)
s2_area(st_as_s2(nc, oriented = TRUE)[1:3]) # no second correction needed here:
## [1] 1137107793 610916077 1423145355
The default conversion from sf
to s2
uses
oriented = FALSE
, so that we get
Here is an example where the oceans are computed as the difference from the full polygon representing the entire globe,
g = st_as_sfc("POLYGON FULL", crs = 'EPSG:4326')
g
## Geometry set for 1 feature
## Geometry type: POLYGON
## Dimension: XY
## Bounding box: xmin: -180 ymin: -90 xmax: 180 ymax: 90
## Geodetic CRS: WGS 84
## POLYGON FULL
and the countries, and shown in an orthographic projection:
options(s2_oriented = TRUE) # don't change orientation from here on
co = st_as_sf(s2_data_countries())
oc = st_difference(g, st_union(co)) # oceans
b = st_buffer(st_as_sfc("POINT(-30 52)", crs = 'EPSG:4326'), 9800000) # visible half
i = st_intersection(b, oc) # visible ocean
plot(st_transform(i, "+proj=ortho +lat_0=52 +lon_0=-30"), col = 'blue')
(Note that the printing of POLYGON FULL
is not valid WKT
according to the simple feature standard, which does not include
this.)
We can now calculate the proportion of the Earth’s surface covered by oceans:
Polygons in s2geometry
can be
In principle the DE9-IM model deals with interior, boundary and exterior, and intersection predicates are sensitive to this (the difference between contains and covers is all about boundaries). DE9-IM however cannot uniquely assign points to polygons when polygons form a polygon coverage (no overlaps, but shared boundaries). This means that if we would count points by polygon, and some points fall on shared polygon boundaries, we either miss them (contains) or we count them double (covers, intersects); this might lead to bias and require post-processing. Using SEMI-OPEN non-overlapping polygons guarantees that every point is assigned to maximally one polygon in an intersection. This corresponds to e.g. how this would be handled in a grid (raster) coverage, where every grid cell (typically) only contains its upper-left corner and its upper and left sides.
a = st_as_sfc("POINT(0 0)", crs = 'EPSG:4326')
b = st_as_sfc("POLYGON((0 0,1 0,1 1,0 1,0 0))", crs = 'EPSG:4326')
st_intersects(a, b, model = "open")
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 1, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: (empty)
st_intersects(a, b, model = "closed")
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 1, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: 1
st_intersects(a, b, model = "semi-open") # a toss
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 1, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: (empty)
st_intersects(a, b) # default: closed
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 1, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: 1
Computing the minimum and maximum values over coordinate ranges, as
sf
does with st_bbox()
, is of limited value
for spherical coordinates because due the the spherical space, the
area covered is not necessarily covered by the coordinate
range. Two examples:
S2 has two alternatives: the bounding cap and the bounding rectangle:
fiji = s2_data_countries("Fiji")
aa = s2_data_countries("Antarctica")
s2_bounds_cap(fiji)
## lng lat angle
## 1 178.7459 -17.15444 1.801369
s2_bounds_rect(c(fiji,aa))
## lng_lo lat_lo lng_hi lat_hi
## 1 177.285 -18.28799 -179.7933 -16.02088
## 2 -180.000 -90.00000 180.0000 -63.27066
The cap reports a bounding cap (circle) as a mid point (lat, lng) and
an angle around this point. The bounding rectangle reports the
_lo
and _hi
bounds of lat
and
lng
coordinates. Note that for Fiji, lng_lo
being higher than lng_hi
indicates that the region covers
(crosses) the antimeridian.
The two-dimensional R2 library that was
formerly used by sf
is GEOS, and sf
can be
instrumented to use GEOS or s2
. First we will ask if
s2
is being used by default:
then we can switch it off (and use GEOS) by
and switch it on (and use s2) by
options(s2_oriented = FALSE) # correct orientation from here on
library(sf)
library(units)
## udunits database from /usr/share/xml/udunits/udunits2.xml
nc = read_sf(system.file("gpkg/nc.gpkg", package="sf"))
sf_use_s2(TRUE)
a1 = st_area(nc)
sf_use_s2(FALSE)
## Spherical geometry (s2) switched off
a2 = st_area(nc)
plot(a1, a2)
abline(0, 1)
All unary and binary predicates are available in s2
,
except for st_relate()
with a pattern. In addition, when
using the s2
predicates, depending on the
model
, intersections with neighbours are only reported when
model
is closed
(the default):
sf_use_s2(TRUE)
## Spherical geometry (s2) switched on
st_intersects(nc[1:3,], nc[1:3,]) # self-intersections + neighbours
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 3, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: 1, 2
## 2: 1, 2, 3
## 3: 2, 3
sf_use_s2(TRUE)
st_intersects(nc[1:3,], nc[1:3,], model = "semi-open") # only self-intersections
## Sparse geometry binary predicate list of length 3, where the predicate
## was `intersects'
## 1: 1
## 2: 2
## 3: 3
st_intersection()
, st_union()
,
st_difference()
, and st_sym_difference()
are
available as s2
equivalents. N-ary intersection and
difference are not (yet) present; cascaded union is present; unioning by
feature does not work with s2
.
Buffers can be calculated for features with geographic coordinates as follows, using an unprojected object representing the UK as an example:
uk = s2_data_countries("United Kingdom")
class(uk)
## [1] "s2_geography" "wk_vctr"
uk_sfc = st_as_sfc(uk)
uk_buffer = st_buffer(uk_sfc, dist = 20000)
uk_buffer2 = st_buffer(uk_sfc, dist = 20000, max_cells = 10000)
uk_buffer3 = st_buffer(uk_sfc, dist = 20000, max_cells = 100)
class(uk_buffer)
## [1] "sfc_MULTIPOLYGON" "sfc"
plot(uk_sfc)
plot(uk_buffer)
plot(uk_buffer2)
plot(uk_buffer3)
uk_sf = st_as_sf(uk)
The plots above show that you can adjust the level of spatial
precision in the results of s2 buffer operations with the
max_cells
argument, set to 1000 by default. Deciding on an
appropriate value is a balance between excessive detail increasing
computational resources (represented by uk_buffer2
, bottom
left) and excessive simplification (bottom right). Note that buffers
created with s2 always follow s2 cell boundaries, they are
never smooth. Hence, choosing a large number for max_cells
leads to seemingly smooth but, zoomed in, very complex buffers.
To achieve a similar result you could first transform the result and
then use sf::st_buffer()
. A simple benchmark shows the
computational efficiency of the s2
geometry engine in
comparison with transforming and then creating buffers:
# the sf way
system.time({
uk_projected = st_transform(uk_sfc, 27700)
uk_buffer_sf = st_buffer(uk_projected, dist = 20000)
})
## user system elapsed
## 0.027 0.000 0.028
# sf way with few than the 30 segments in the buffer
system.time({
uk_projected = st_transform(uk_sfc, 27700)
uk_buffer_sf2 = st_buffer(uk_projected, dist = 20000, nQuadSegs = 4)
})
## user system elapsed
## 0.009 0.000 0.009
# s2 with default cell size
system.time({
uk_buffer = s2_buffer_cells(uk, distance = 20000)
})
## user system elapsed
## 0.023 0.000 0.024
# s2 with 10000 cells
system.time({
uk_buffer2 = s2_buffer_cells(uk, distance = 20000, max_cells = 10000)
})
## user system elapsed
## 0.217 0.000 0.217
# s2 with 100 cells
system.time({
uk_buffer2 = s2_buffer_cells(uk, distance = 20000, max_cells = 100)
})
## user system elapsed
## 0.003 0.000 0.003
The result of the previous benchmarks emphasizes the point that there are trade-offs between geographic resolution and computational resources, something that web developers working on geographic services such as Google Maps understand well. In this case the default setting of 1000 cells, which runs slightly faster than the default transform -> buffer workflow, is probably appropriate given the low resolution of the input geometry representing the UK.
st_buffer
or st_is_within_distance
?As discussed in the sf
issue
tracker, deciding on workflows and selecting appropriate levels of
level of geographic resolution can be an iterative process.
st_buffer()
as powered by GEOS, for R2 data, are smooth and
(nearly) exact. st_buffer()
as powered by S2 is rougher, complex,
non-smooth, and may need tuning. An common pattern where
st_buffer()
is used is this:
x
(points,
lines, polygons)y
and aggregate them (e.g. count points,
or average a raster variable like precipitation or population
density)When this is the case, and you are working with geographic
coordinates, it may pay off to not compute buffers, but instead
directly work with st_is_within_distance()
to select, for
each feature of x
, all features of y
that are
within a certain distance d
from x
. The S2 version of this
function uses spatial indexes, so is fast for large datasets.